Without the Right to Be Mistaken

Without the Right to Be Mistaken / Rosa María Rodríguez Torrado

Rosa Maria Rodriguez Torrado, Translator: Unstated

's public justifying his delay in modifying

everything that must be reformed sounds like a hollow cliché which, to

be fair to Cubans and our history, the truly practical and effective

thing would be that it were changed.

"We don't have the right to be mistaken" is no more than a military

slogan brought to the civilian field, whose truth the same authorities

are constantly putting to the test, by counterproductive decisions and

the interests of the state bureaucracy that surrounds the

general- himself.

An example is the law decree 259 concerning the delivery of lands (to

farmers in a form of leasing called "usufruct"), which was "reformed"

and undone according to decree 300, in which is evidenced the intention

to not cede control, which for the Cuban totalitarian model equates to

not losing power.

It is incredible that after almost fifty-four years in government, the

repeated and apparent improvisation of the authorities leaves us the

frustrating and exhausting flavor of the endless dictatorial problem. If

in psychology contradictory tendencies in people generate anguish and

even neurotic disorders, as a society, what will be provoked in us by

the permanent conflicts that the government has gotten us accustomed to

and that they seem to have no intention of solving?

With the same slogan they spent two years "analyzing and studying" in

order to "not be mistaken" and to bring to us Cubans an incomplete

/immigration law that in spite of recognizing only a handful of

rights for those on the island, truncates and leaves inconclusive many

of those belonging to our diaspora.

The motto remains in force — as an expression, clearly — not because the

real changes that they urge for our society are really taken seriously,

it seems. The keep us entertained with the dual game of "I want to but I

do not dare," when in reality they "dare and can, but do not want to."

The foremost objective is to create for themselves a good programmatic

cushion for the seat of those that succeed them or inherit, and later,

for each to use his legal "reformist" feather duster in his own way so

as to move the dust from one place to another and appear to be cleaning.

Maybe with such manipulations the moment will arrive when a deep

cleaning becomes truly necessary, rearranging the furniture and the

surly personnel accustomed to the homeland being the pedestal for the

group that comes to power. That, it seems, is the basic currency of

these systems, and in preserving their privileges they certainly will

not allow themselves the least bit of carelessness or the right to be


November 28 2012


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Donate for Servers

We run various sites in defense of human rights and need support to pay for more powerful servers. Thank you.


November 2012
« Oct   Dec »
  1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30