News and Facts about Cuba

The Blackboard Mafia

The Blackboard Mafia / 14ymedio, Miriam Celaya

14ymedio, Miriam Celaya, Havana, 5 July 2015 — “Everyone knows which
teachers accept money,” a group of young people tells me. In fact, some
not only accept, but clearly require it from students who know they
would not be able to pass the exam on their own.

The final days of the 2015-2016 year are here, and once again the
recurring theme of fraud by students and teachers surfaces, poor
preparation of students, low quality of and the shocking loss
of values among not a few education professionals.

A group of five 10th and 11th graders of the pre- Gerardo
Abreu Fontán, of Centro Habana, agreed to offer their testimony on the
subject under conditions of anonymity, in an interview that lasted more
than two hours and uncovered before me a broad and deep network of

“You know you are going to have to come straight with me…” says a
professor to a bad student, in a full classroom and in the presence of
all other students. A phrase that, from a pure semantics point does not
say much, but that in marginal code says it all. The aforementioned
understands and abides: the game’s move is set.

Around this sunspot there is a whole system of tariffs and strategies
that work seamlessly interlocked with the precision of a Swiss watch.
Impunity in this maze of fraudulent trickeries is almost absolute.

There is a kind of unwritten agreement In Havana that stipulates an
approximate rate, depending on the type of examination (whether oral or
written), the period evaluated (if the test is partial or final), the
neighborhood where the school is located (which is usually indicative of
the purchasing power of the student’s family) and quality and/or
experience of the professor.

Thus, to achieve a good grade on a mandatory mid-term (known as a
“Partial Control Work” with the initials TCP), a student from a
relatively solvent family who is generally behind must pay between 2 or
3 CUC (Cuban convertible pesos) to the subject’s teacher. Some teachers,
however, charge at a rate of 4 CUC per grade per question, so,
considering that a TCP contains three questions; the cost can go up to
12 CUC for each TCP for each core subject.

Meanwhile, the final exam contains five questions, but the system and
the going rate in this case vary, depending on what manoeuver is used.
For example, a variant is that a certain number of students previously
disclose to the subject’s teacher their interest in paying for the
proctor during the exam so he will let the students cheat, whether it is
looking up each correct answer in books or notebooks or copying among

The proctor, in turn, charges 5 CUC for each student involved in the
plot, from which he will pay a portion to the professor who teaches the
subject and another to the person in charge that year, who will turn a
blind eye when he makes the classroom rounds to guarantee the
transparency of the evaluation process. So the circle of what we might
call a blackboard mafia is closed.

Assuming that there are four subjects with written finals—Spanish, Math,
Biology and History—and that there are an increasing number of students
interested in using this negotiated evaluation process, it is easy to
conclude that the dividends to these “educators” stemming from fraud far
exceed their paid wages.

Another variation, usually applied when the teacher has a close
relationship with the student and his family, is to conduct the review
of examinations at either the home of the student or teacher, where the
professor will dictate the correct answers to the student, thus allowing
for corrections of mistakes made in the classroom. In these cases,
payment is not in the form of cash, but masked in the form of a more or
less expensive gift, accompanied by the corresponding eternal
“gratitude” of the adolescent’s family.

Finally, there is also the old trick of altering official assessment
records, so the teacher gives the student a higher grade than the grade
received in the evaluations, which raises the student’s rank so he will
have easy access to better university career choices once he finishes
high school.

However, the juiciest peculiarity takes place at the provincial level,
where the tests are prepared and the final exams and revaluations are
“guarded.” According to the students interviewed, both can be bought for
a price of about 30 CUC, although the student or his family must know
the right person to contact, because otherwise it could mean severe

Meanwhile, the new form of oral assessment for subjects like Physics and
Chemistry in pre-university education, which was established in the
2014-2015 school year to “facilitate” student grades and elevate their
advancement, has only managed to diversify the corruption behaviors of
teachers to defraud the system.

These tests are performed through paper forms known as “ballots,”
developed at the provincial level. The procedure is simple: the “paying”
student will speak to that subject’s professor, who in turn will
coordinate the gimmick with some member of the hearing panel to whom he
will deliver a list with the names of those students who will pay for
their grade in advance. Meanwhile, on the date of the exam, the corrupt
faculty panel member, once he has verified the student’s name on the
list, gives the student a ballot containing the answers, or he points
out the answers to the incorrect ones written by the student, in cases
when the student chooses to fill out the ballot himself.

Each subject has a different price, depending on its complexity. A
Physics test, for example, costs 15 CUC this year. Chemistry is often
cheaper, 5 to 10 CUC, or a gift, which can be anything from perfume, a
wallet, or any article of clothing to a bottle of rum.

Evaluations of subjects that are “not important,” such as Political
Culture, English, or Computing, almost always are bought, because they
are cheap and almost everyone can do it, and so you get it off your mind
easily with 2 or 3 CUC or a modest gift, if it is a TCP”.

For a final exam, those who can will pay 5 CUC so they won’t have to
make a presentation at the evaluation seminars, which is how they are
evaluated. “Sometimes you pay the teacher to give you seminar from a
previous year, and you can then transcribe it, as if it was your own work.”

“And all that without taking into consideration that, in addition, on
Teachers Day, they get lots of presents,” says M, the most lively of the
students interviewed.

But the corruption of the education system is not limited to the
evaluation process. According to testimonies from students and parents,
access at the end of the ninth grade (secondary school) to a
pre-university slot higher than the student’s rating would entitle them
to, costs about 100 CUC, paid directly to the school board, or it is
“negotiated” through some municipal official with the Ministry of
Education (MINED) responsible for the “grants.”

Judging by these statements, corruption is decaying the previously
formidable Cuban educational system and it is sprinkling into everyday
life, so much so that even students who have not succumbed to the
mechanism of fraud—whether for moral reasons or their family’s financial
limitations—perceive it as commonplace, perhaps a questionable issue,
but not a crime at all.

“It’s normal to some extent,” states G, an 11th grader who dreams of
making a career in design. “It’s not that I feel respect for those
corrupt professors, but I don’t care. It’s not my problem.”

In the case of R, an adolescent with beautiful features and pleasant
manners who wants to be a doctor, he believes that what these educators
do is not right, but “each person is worthy of respect, that is their
livelihood. If we had a different , other wages, different
teacher training … perhaps it would be different.”

Once again, M intervenes with a sharp reflection for his young age. He
expresses himself with ease: “The problem is that the Government doesn’t
pay them enough. It doesn’t invest in professors or their training,
because they don’t produce immediate gains, as in the case of doctors,
for instance, who go to foreign assignments and the government takes
almost all the money they get paid abroad. Of course teachers are
looking for any way to make money, especially the younger ones, who want
to go out, have fun and buy fashionable clothes and shoes, just like us.”

All the teens assent in tacit agreement, while something akin to despair
invades my being. These youngsters have offered me a glimpse of the true
dimension of the damage inflicted to the spiritual body of Cuban
society, not just to the economy. I am impressed by the colossal task
that will be entailed in rebuilding the moral fragments of our nation,
once the long nightmare of the Castro regime has ended. Of course, I
don’t accept defeat in advance, but, for now, corruption is continuing
to spread its tentacles and threatening to win the game.

Translated by Norma Whiting

Source: The Blackboard Mafia / 14ymedio, Miriam Celaya – Translating
Cuba –

4 Responses to The Blackboard Mafia

  • If accurate, this is a disgraceful reflection on the Cuban education and examination system. It seems that there is no system of external examinations in Cuba, as in the UK, where examination scripts are marked by people who have no knowledge of the schools or the pupils concerned. Some countries eg Singapore, pay a foreign country to set and mark all their external examinations, viz University of Cambridge, UK, so there is no possibility of corruption of local examiners by wealthy parents and corrupt education staff.

    • Regretfully, William, all information about the state of education in Cuba indicates a continued breakdown. From a lack of educators (too low salaries) to the prohibition of doing tutorial work to get extra income for those who are still in the profession everything is going wrong on the educational side. The facilities are bad: decaying buildings, lack of educational equipment, …
      School meals have been all eradicated destroying the claim of additional food for children.
      The system is in disarray.
      More: (online translation available on the site)
      Read up William.

  • As an examiner myself in the UK I appreciate that examinations outside the control of the school staff are a prerequisite for fair and corruption-free examinations. I myself have marked papers from a range of countries, including Singapore and Mauritius, where pupils sit examinations for university entrance set and marked in the UK.

    I was surprised to see that Cuban teachers are not permitted to offer their services outside school hours as a privater tutor. I can think of no logical reason for this prohibition; the abolition of this rule would benefit everyone, the pupils, the teachers and national standards of education.

    • William, I would recommend you get a course in Spanish. your access to data is incomplete and biased. Anyone that wants to talk intelligently about Cuba should immerse himself in the language to get access at more sources. Lots of your comments have answers and in-depth data on this site but they are in Spanish.
      The reason why educators are not permitted to be tutors is that lots have just left teaching as they can earn a lot more as private tutors. In day-care private institutions are created. They offer better care and educational stimulus than state day-care centers. Being a teacher in Cuba stinks: low wages, no respect and lots of slogans.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us
Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Google PlusCheck Our Feed
July 2016
« Jun   Aug »
  1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Donate for Servers
We run various sites in defense of human rights and need support to pay for more powerful servers. Thank you.
Cubaverdad on Twitter
Tweets by @Cubaverdad