Cubana pre-orders three Antonov planes
Cubana pre-orders three Antonov planes
Russia's Ilyushin Finance Co. signed a letter of intent to finance Cuba's purchase of three Antonov An-158 passenger aircraft at an undisclosed price, Russian news agency Interfax reported.
The pre-contract also includes an option for the purchase of three additional An-158s, according to Spanish news agency efe. A final contract is expected to be signed before the end of the year, delivery is expected for next year.
The AN-158 regional jet, to be used by Cubana de Aviación, was developed by Ukraine's Antonov ASTC and is jointly manufactured by Ukraine's Aviant and Russia's Voronezh Aircraft Production Association. Presented in 2010, it can carry 99 passengers up to 2,500 kilometers (1,553 miles).
According to the Ilyushin Finance Website, Cuba also ordered four slightly smaller An-148 regional jets, for delivery in 2013. The An-158 is a stretched version of the An-148. According to Flight Daily News, the An-148 faced "severe criticism" from Russian flag carrier Rossiya after its launch last year over unreliability and slow response from the manufacturer. Ilyushin Finance says the problems have since been resolved.
In 2005-08, Cubana renewed its aging fleet with three Russian-made IL-96 and two TU-204 long-range jets. These purchases were also financed by Ilyushin Finans."
http://www.cubastandard.com/2011/08/18/cubana-pre-orders-three-antonov-planes/
Travellers staying in Cuba hotels ‘should practise the language’
Travellers staying in Cuba hotels 'should practise the language'Mon, 15 Nov 2010
Jetting off on a holiday that will involve staying in Cuba hotels could be made more pleasurable by learning a few words of the local language.
This is according to Sharron Livingston, editor of thetravelmagazine.net, who suggested taking a list of key words and phrases might help tourists communicate with locals.
"Preparation is key for when you travel … Understand a little bit about the culture of a country, so that when you do go there you don't make any faux pas," she explained.
Phrases such as how much is that?, hello and thank you are great places to start and may prove useful on a daily basis.
Being open-minded and accepting of new traditions and experiences is the best way to get used to a city or country where the customs may be quite different to those elsewhere, Ms Livingston concluded.
Her comments came in response to research from TransPerfect, which revealed eating in restaurants, navigating public transport and booking hotels online were the places travellers came up against most communication problems.
http://www.scuktravel.com/cuba-holiday-news/travellers-staying-in-cuba-hotels-should-practise-the-language-800235485.aspx
Signs of frustration sprout, spread
Posted on Sunday, 04.11.10CUBA'S FUTURESigns of frustration sprout, spreadAfter discussions of reform following the ascension of Raúl Castro failed to end economic turmoil, Cubans are reacting to their government like never before.By ALFONSO CHARDY and JUAN O. [email protected]
The Cuban revolution's iconic singer blasts the government. The usually cautious Catholic Church warns of economic collapse. Raúl Castro mysteriously disappears from public view for 23 days.
A well-known Havana author calls for “democratic socialism.'' A growing number of Cubans are reportedly resigning from the Communist Party. A major corruption scandal hits Havana.
Food shortages are growing, public transport is almost nonexistent in many areas, and the prospects for change are nil, according to five Cubans who arrived last month in Miami.
These are turbulent times in Cuba, where Raúl Castro's rise to the presidency unleashed — and so far has dashed — hopes for far-reaching reforms to yank the island out of its worst economic crisis in decades.
Cuba's communist system has survived many and worse crises and virtually all Cuba-watchers believe Castro, who officially replaced his ailing brother Fidel in 2008, is highly likely to survive this one, too.
Yet signs of the mounting frustration with the current communist system and demands for change are everywhere.
“Never before has the government been so criticized on the street for the disastrous economic situation and for the total lack of official will to promote changes that society is shouting for,'' the longtime Havana correspondent for Spain's El País newspaper wrote March 7.
“If I had to pick just one word to describe the current situation, it would be fragile,'' popular blogger Yoani Sanchez wrote in one recent Tweet. In another, she wrote, “While nonconformity is still curbed by fear, it is threatening to spill out onto the streets.''
Perhaps the most powerful sign of the times came when Silvio Rodriguez, founder and icon of the socially conscious music known as Nueva Trova, unveiled his latest album in Havana March 26.
It's time to “review loads of things, loads of concepts, even institutions,'' he declared, time for more freedom of expression and to remove the “r'' of revolution because Cubans are crying out for “evolution.''
Rodriguez later claimed his comments had been “distorted'' and said he would participate in a “Concert for the Motherland'' Saturday organized by the Cuban government.
Pablo Milanés, another Nueva Trova singer who has criticized the government in the past, said Cuba needs change because “that enormous sun born in 1959 . . is filling up with blotches as it turns older.''
Pedro Campos, a well-known Communist, historian and former diplomat, went even further, writing recently that Cuba must “advance toward a new socialist society that overcomes the memories of a dogmatic and failed scheme of neo-Stalinist style.''
Castro's supporters insist that such criticism is part of an officially sanctioned debate among government officials, academics, intellectuals and others on the changes needed to make the island more productive — without major disruptions or turning to capitalism.
Yet the official Granma newspaper did not report Rodriguez's harshest comments, and its cartoon Tuesday showed him saying, “I sang for the poor,'' plus the comment, “That was before he earned a lot of money.''
RAUL RETREATS
The Cuban media meanwhile made no mention of any public appearances by Raúl Castro Jan. 8-31, according to U.S. intelligence reports. The 78-year-old Castro has a history of retreating into isolation when he fights with older brother Fidel.
A growing number of Cubans are leaving or refusing to join the Communist Party and the Communist Youth, Spain's La Vanguardia newspaper reported last week, without citing sources or exact figures.
Havana also has been shaken by a mayor corruption scandal allegedly involving Max Marambio, a Chilean leftist, and former Civil Aviation chief Rogelio Acevedo — both longtime confidants of Fidel Castro.
“If Marambio is not safe, then no one is safe. He was truly untouchable'' because of his friendship with Fidel, said a Miami resident who has contacts with top government officials and asked for anonymity to speak freely on the issue.
The Miamian added that many Cuban officials now seem paralyzed, caught between those at the leadership level who want to move fast on reforms, to get the stagnant economy moving again, and those who want to go slow, to avert a possible loss of political controls.
“Everybody seems to be in a fog, because their hands are tied,'' the Miamian added. “There's a sadness on their faces, like things are beginning to crumble.''
Former CIA analyst Brian Latell, now a senior research assistant with the University of Miami's Institute for Cuban and Cuban American Studies, said he was not surprised by the growing frustrations.
`PLAYING WITH FIRE'
Raúl Castro “was playing with fire'' when he encouraged Cubans to debate the island's problems in 2007, Latell said. “He was stoking a degree of popular involvement that was alien to the Cuban people.''
Cubans are still waiting for a string of Castro's promised and rumored changes, among them:increased agricultural production, higher salaries, a more efficient economy and perhaps even an end to the requirement of exit permits for travel abroad.
Interviews with five newly-arrived Cuban migrants in Miami indicated that people on the island have grown increasingly frustrated with the lack of progress they hoped Raúl Castro would bring about.
“We expected positive change and on the contrary everything was halted and the only thing he has said is that we have to tighten our belts more,'' said Roberto Carlos, a 26-year-old carpenter from Sancti Spiritus. “Everyone thought Cuba would open up to the world but that hasn't happened.''
SPEAKING OUT
Four of the Cubans interviewed also agreed that people on the island have grown more willing to voice their frustrations in public.
“Even [communist] party members and ministry officials very daringly comment,'' said Fernando Rodriguez, a lawyer who left Havana this year. “And people you don't even know complain so clearly and loudly in public that you say, `Uff!' ''
“The Cuban people are tired of waiting for change, and in getting tired of waiting they have also lost the fear they once had of speaking out against bad things,'' added Lester Peñalver, 26, a Havana graduate of journalism studies who arrived last week.
Even his parents, members of the Communist Party and their neighborhood watch group, the Committee for the Defense of the Revolution, have grown frustrated, Peñalver added.
Most of the recent arrivals interviewed agreed that the frustrations are unlikely to lead to increased support for dissident groups like the Ladies in White, largely because they are not well-known inside Cuba.
“When I was in Cuba, I never heard of this group,'' said Miriam Quevedo, a 25-year-old nurse from western Pinar del Rio.
Latell said the kinds of reforms needed to ease those frustrations don't appear to be close at hand. Cuban officials, he said, “are a long way from being able to make those forms of economic transitions. They are just subsisting now.''
Yet there's growing pressure in Cuba to move more quickly.
For now, Cubans who make it to the United States find renewed hope in their new country and warn that more people are likely to follow.
“Everyone in Cuba would like to leave,'' said Angel Ojeda, 38, who arrived in Miami last month.
http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/04/11/v-fullstory/1571911/signs-of-frustration-sprout-spread.html
Understanding Dictatorships
Understanding Dictatorships From Iran to Cuba, the question of legitimacy is paramountJon Basil Utley | September 1, 2009
Recent anti-government demonstrations in Iran have raised our consciousness about the dangers of misunderstanding Third World dictatorships. To most Americans, the word dictator means a Stalin or Hitler—which is the reason our presidents usually accuse new enemies of being new "Hitlers." Contraposing this, the traditional view of most Americans is that citizens support their government and, if a people really opposed their rulers, the citizenry would overthrow them, like we did the British in 1776. From this viewpoint, the bombing and killing of enemy civilians is "morally" justifiable because "they" generally approved of their (evil) government, or otherwise would have rebelled and overthrown it.
Hitler and Stalin are best understood as totalitarian dictators, a 20th century European creation, enabled by modern science and political mobilization. Third World dictatorships are different. Most of them are very weak and don't exercise total control, as evidenced by Iran.
The most common misunderstanding centers on the fact that all governments, even dictatorships, need some form of legitimacy to justify their rule to their own people. Otherwise they must revert to brute force, which is both expensive and corrupting to the police and army, who then abuse their respective powers and cause growing public resentment and anger. But while force and fear are temporarily effective, they are not enough for the longer term. A foreign threat thus helps dictators, as it is used to justify their despotic rule. Economic blockades can also reinforce dictatorial power and indeed even make governments richer as they profit from the consequent smuggling and black markets. In the eyes and minds of the conquered, American soldiers certainly do not have "legitimacy," as we have repeatedly learned.
Understanding Dictatorships
Understanding how such dictatorships actually function would help Washington to avoid more foreign policy disasters. If Americans better understood the weaknesses of most foreign tyrannies, we'd be less inclined to see them as great threats. Also, we would have to face the reality that administering them effectively would mean establishing a permanent corps of occupation forces on the British or Roman model. Even then modern communications and weaponry might make our rule fail. Tribal societies cannot be easily converted into democracies.
In the old days legitimacy came from the divine right of kings or priests who gained their authority from God. In tribal societies, custom and inherited status have played much the same role. Tribes are ruled by a council of elders on the theory that they have the experience, knowledge, and wisdom to make intelligent decisions.
The Roman emperors claimed religious and Senatorial authority. Later they provided a "rule of law" with safety and free trade for their subjects who previously had only known wars, piracy, and civil strife. Remember that Saint Paul could not be tortured by the police because he was a Roman citizen. Yet even the Romans needed to provide bread and circuses (welfare) to the masses in order to maintain support for their legitimacy.
In modern times democracy provides that legitimacy, hence the extreme measures—including fake elections—dictatorships will go to in order to claim the semblance of lawful control. Wartime, however, was always recognized as needing centralized, unrestrained rule. In ancient Greece even democracies, when at war, would elect a dictator for a year at a time on the theory that only a single ruler could act forcefully without delays and second guessing by committees, elders, or legislators.
Tribal Power
In Iraq we learned belatedly that Saddam Hussein ruled through tribal leaders, in particular by bribing and accommodating them. Intimidation was certainly part of his rule, but not the base of it. Washington's usual war propaganda went all out with stories of his (in particular his sons') torturing the innocent and killing at will. However, in tribal societies, rape and wanton killings bring about vengeance and are not done lightly. Hussein ruled mainly through his own tribe, relying upon them in key positions of power, a method in accordance with tribal traditions.
Nor was it considered "corrupt" to use government power to profit one's family, clan, or tribe. Everybody did it! Look at Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, or Afghanistan today. Profiting oneself, one's clan, and one's tribe is a tradition stretching back thousands of years. What America calls "corruption" has been the world's way of life until relatively recently. Saddam Hussein''s original theory of government was Baathist Arab socialism, a form of national socialism or fascism first supported in the Arab world as a way to modernize their nations. But after the First Gulf War in 1991 Hussein reverted to tribal control.
The British, on the other hand, ruled their empire by playing different tribes against each other. They well understood that after generations of war, rape, and pillage most tribes hated their neighbors far more than they hated any foreign enemy. Only in modern times, with the rise of nationalism, did Third World nations finally overthrow European imperialism.
Washington's plans to create democracy and legitimate government for Iraq and Afghanistan in a few years crashes against these traditions. For thousands of years tribal systems have provided for personal and economic security. Such traditions do not change quickly. Clans and tribes provided for widows and orphans (insurance), shared economic scarcity, provided for common defense, and offered vengeance for harm done to their members. (For details see my earlier article "Tribes, Veils and Democracy.") However, tribal societies are also inherently unjust for smaller tribes and thus are usually unstable and unable to bring much economic development.
Rotten to the Core
The weakness of most Third World dictatorships is evidenced by their dysfunction and poverty. In the case of Iran, for example, gasoline costs only 20 cents per gallon, although much is imported and the government is too incompetent to build more refineries. A strong government would not be subsidizing it. The mullahs used to have legitimacy on the basis of religion, traditional values, and nationalism. Now, however, they've lost most of it and depend upon the force of their militia and "Revolutionary Guards." The reward for these enforcers has been the control of many businesses and even the black market. Yet that easy money corrupts them and makes them more abusive. Yet Iran is demonized in America as if it was a competent state—it isn't. And its government won't last.
The former appeal of communism to many Third World leaders was because its ideology gave it a form of legitimacy, justifying the most brutal repression to break down tribal loyalties in the name of throwing off imperialist rule and promising fast economic development. Communist revolutionaries were very cognizant of the political strength of tribal custom and religious fundamentalism. They saw both as being inimical to both their rule and to economic development and tried always to suppress them.
Although effective when allied with nationalism, communism was so inefficient and unresponsive a system in throwing off European (and American) colonialism that most regimes collapsed or adopted free-market measures once Soviet subsidies ceased coming.
Maintaining Legitimacy
I saw the problem of legitimacy firsthand when I lived in Cuba in 1958 during the last year of President Fulgencio Batista's rule. He depended upon the police and army and on those businessmen who profited from his government. But Cuba was developing a middle class that wanted legitimate, responsive government like they saw in America. Batista never used the type of brutality Fidel Castro later imposed, but his government was corrupt, and was dependent on cronyism and upon its police, who were in turn corrupted by power. I saw how they would shake down businesses and common citizens, but still Batista depended upon them. He could not control their corruption which then contributed to his overthrow.
Similarly, when I first visited Russia with a group of journalists in 1987 the black market was widespread. One dealer even traveled with us in our Inturist government tour bus. The government was beginning to collapse. Widespread corruption, incompetence, a failed war in Afghanistan, and the widespread knowledge of how much better life was in the prosperous West fatally weakened the legitimacy of the regime. I remember arriving in Finland on the return trip. Taking a bus in Helsinki cost me a dollar compared to Moscow's subway which cost only a few cents. I thought then how Finland had a strong democratic government, not afraid to charge riders for the real costs of public transport.
In the 1960s I lived in Peru after a coup by leftist generals who promised a reform agenda. The generals tried to base their legitimacy on opposing American business domination of their country, by claiming to represent a "Third Way," neither capitalist nor communist, and by promising economic fairness and fast development. I saw the ineptness of their rule as they tried to avoid brutal methods of control. When they failed to deliver on their promises, they lost their "legitimacy" and soon returned the nation to civilian rule. Interestingly, state control of the media allowed corruption to flourish. Intellectuals think the purpose of a free media is to allow criticism of government policy. But its main effect is to expose the corruption of government officials. We see today in Russia the same situation as media control begets growing corruption.
Understanding Third World governments and tribal societies would save America from the disastrous interventions, unending wars, and growing domestic bankruptcy. We can't simply "win" wars with such regimes, as jingoists demand, and then come home to celebrate. War is not a football game.
Jon Basil Utley is associate publisher of The American Conservative. He is a former insurance executive with AIG and a former South American correspondent for Knight Ridder.
Understanding Dictatorships: From Iran to Cuba, the question of legitimacy is paramount – Reason Magazine (1 September 2009)http://www.reason.com/news/show/135775.html
Havana wields carrot and stick as it rethinks ideology Workers gain as Havana rethinks its ideological focus
Havana wields carrot and stick as it rethinks ideology Workers gain as Havana rethinks its ideological focus
By Marc Frank in Havana
Published: January 9 2009 02:00 | Last updated: January 9 2009 02:00
Fifty years ago, Fidel Castro swept into Cuba's capital on January 8, promising to establish a socialist state that would promote collectivism over individualism.
But the anniversary celebrations, which culminated in an evening rally in Havana yesterday, have put less emphasis on social spending and more on rewarding individual labour, as Cuba under the leadership of Fidel Castro's younger brother Raúl moves away from its decades-old commitment to communism.
In a series of speeches and interviews dedicated to the anniversary, President Raúl Castro hammered away at the theme that workers did not appreciate many government benefits – with the exception of free health, education and subsidised culture – and should be given higher wages instead.
"It is well known that the vast majority of people do not appreciate a gratuity or generally high subsidies of goods and services as part of the return for their labour, for which they look only at wages," he told parliament on December 27.
In the same speech, he said subsidised holidays at tourism resorts were being scrapped, along with 50 per cent of government travel abroad and other unnamed gratuities.
Many Cubans applaud the new policy but worry that wages will not rise as quickly as gratuities disappear.
Cuba has had a second world war-style food ration system since the revolution. Public transport and utilities are heavily subsidised, as are many workplace rewards, even though an economic crisis following the Soviet collapse, combined with remittances sent by relatives from abroad, have long since undermined income equality.
"Why, after working 24 years, is my ration the same as people who have never worked?" asked Nancy Artigas, a Havana resident. "What's more, their rights and benefits are the same as mine. That doesn't seem fair – nor is it a way to get people to work."
Although 85 per cent of workers receive no hard currency from their jobs, an estimated 40 per cent of the population receives some money from abroad.
Cuba reports annual per capita income, including gratuities and subsidies, as being $6,000 (€4,380, £3,960), although the average yearly wage is the peso equivalent of only $240 at the official exchange rate.
After taking over from his ailing brother Fidel last February, Raúl Castro has freed up sales of computers, mobile phones and other consumer goods and lifted caps on wages and on what farmers may earn. Cuba is struggling with mounting deficits, low productivity and the need to import
70 per cent of its food.
In an interview carried by the official media to mark the anniversary of the revolution, Mr Castro said wages should reflect the real value of one's work, and that those who did not work should feel economic pressure to do so.
"If we do not take measures to ensure people feel the necessity of working to satisfy their needs, we will not get out of the hole we are in, and we are going to get out of it," he said. Cuba's trade and budget deficits soared and its current account balance deteriorated in 2008, despite a 4.3 per cent increase in gross domestic product – casting a pall over the anniversary celebrations that wound up in Havana yesterday.
In recent years, the country has helped to pay for its trade deficit through revenue from tourism and from services exports – mainly for health and education to its oil-rich ally Venezuela, which now faces a big drop in oil revenues. Tourism and services revenues did increase last year, but not by enough to compensate.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/bea82e40-ddef-11dd-87dc-000077b07658.html
Recent Comments